Mr. Trump said he was asking government lawyers to see if there was any way to get around the ruling, and still get that citizenship question on the Census form, which has not been fully finalized by federal officials as yet.
Seems totally ridiculous that our government, and indeed Country, cannot ask a basic question of Citizenship in a very expensive, detailed and important Census, in this case for 2020. I have asked the lawyers if they can delay the Census, no matter how long, until the.....
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 27, 2019
.....United States Supreme Court is given additional information from which it can make a final and decisive decision on this very critical matter. Can anyone really believe that as a great Country, we are not able the ask whether or not someone is a Citizen. Only in America!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 27, 2019
But while the President was aggravated with the outcome, his anger was somewhat misdirected, as the Supreme Court decision was not on the merits of the citizenship question, but rather on whether the Trump Administration had properly followed the rules in making the question change.
The issue involves what is known as the Administrative Procedure Act, which does not allow actions by federal agencies considered to be "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law."
In his majority ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts all but accused Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross of lying to the courts and Congress about the process involved in trying to add the citizenship question, and why it was being done, as the Court rejected the assertion that it involved the Voting Rights Act.
"Altogether, the evidence tells a story that does not match the Secretary’s explanation for his decision," Roberts wrote in the 5-4 decision, describing the main argument from the Trump Administration as 'contrived.'
"If judicial review is to be more than an empty ritual," the Chief Justice wrote, "it must demand something better than the explanation offered for the action taken in this case."
The #Census case is a perfect example of "malevolence tempered by incompetence." Five Justices had no problem with asking a citizenship question in the abstract, but the Trump administration did such a bad job of covering its tracks that the Chief Justice couldn't stomach it...
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) June 27, 2019
"In a nutshell, the Court did not decisively reject the inclusion of a citizenship question, but today's decision is going to make it _very_ difficult, both legally and logistically, for the government to ultimately ask the question," said Steve Vladeck, a law professor at the University of Texas.
In Congress, Democrats vowed to keep pushing for answers from the Commerce Department on the machinations behind the citizenship question, with lawmakers convinced that Ross and other officials have not told the truth about their efforts.
"Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross testified before Congress that the Trump Administration was adding the citizenship question to the census ‘solely’ at the request of the Justice Department to help enforce the Voting Rights Act," said Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD).
"The Supreme Court has now eviscerated this claim, calling it a ‘pretext,’ ‘contrived,’ and ‘incongruent with what the record reveals,'" said Cummings, who has fought with GOP lawmakers to enforce subpoenas for more testimony about the Census decision-making by the Trump Administration.
About the Author