The subpoena in question did not go directly to President Trump, but instead to the Mazars accounting firm, which has been used for years by Mr. Trump for financial services.
Not long after the decision was announced, President Trump's legal team made clear they would not drop their challenge.
BREAKING: Jay Sekulow statement on 2nd Circuit opinion against POTUS allowing for a NY state criminal subpoena to the Trump Org: "We will be taking this case to the Supreme Court."
— Darren Samuelsohn (@dsamuelsohn) November 4, 2019
Trump attorney Jay Sekulow responds: "The decision of the Second Circuit will be taken to the Supreme Court. The issue raised in this case go to the heart of our Republic. The constitutional issues are significant." - h/t @kwelkernbc https://t.co/z6VSJjksWL
— Geoff Bennett (@GeoffRBennett) November 4, 2019
During court arguments in October, the President's legal team said Mr. Trump cannot be investigated - even if he committed a murder on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan.
"I'm talking about while in office," Judge Denny Chin said during court arguments. "Nothing could be done - that is your position?"
"That is correct," the President's lawyer responded.
In this case, Manhattan prosecutors want documents from the Mazars accounting firm used by President Trump, as investigators want eight years of financial documents.
"The subpoena at issue is directed not to the President, but to his accountants," the judges wrote in their decision, as they said "compliance does not require the President to do anything at all."
But Mr. Trump's lawyers say a subpoena to his accounting firm is just the same as a subpoena to the President.
This is the case where @realDonaldTrump’s lawyer said he could literally shoot someone on 5th ave and not be investigated for it.
— David Fahrenthold (@Fahrenthold) November 4, 2019
The appeals court did not agree. https://t.co/QUwmydS1mw
Here's the nut of the 2d Cir. decision allowing a NY grand jury to subpoena non-private, non-privileged material from Trump's accounting firm. https://t.co/4UuqXnvkCQ pic.twitter.com/BTAB7xumGJ
— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) November 4, 2019
This case is part of a growing series of judicial fights involving the President over evidence about his tax returns, testimony by White House aides, and materials from the Mueller investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 elections.
About the Author