You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.


  • ePAPER

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and interactive features. Starting at just 99c for 8 weeks.


Welcome to

Your source for Clark and Champaign counties’ hometown news. All readers have free access to a limited number of stories every month.

If you are a News-Sun subscriber, please take a moment to login for unlimited access.

breaking news

Former President George H.W. Bush hospitalized in Houston, official says

Witt Series speaker sees future for ‘personalized medicine’

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has long used randomized statistical tests as the gold standard in deciding whether drugs or medical procedures are safe and effective for the population at large.

“Personalized medicine” is based on the hope that such tests and other statistical methods can help doctors to determine how best to treat any given patient at any given time.

Marie Davidian offered a glimpse of what that might look like last week at the final event of this year’s Wittenberg Series.

The title for her IBM Endowed Lecture in the Sciences was “The Right Treatment for the Right Patient (at the Right Time): Personalized Medicine and Statistics.”

The William Neal Reynolds Professor of Statistics at North Carolina State University told her audience in Hollenbeck Bayley Auditorium the personalized medicine movement currently remains a “quest,” although one with tremendous promise.

In the giddy first days after scientists successfully mapped the human genome, she said, “there was the hope” that researchers might be able to sort out which patients needed which treatments based on their genetic profiles alone.

Although this works in a limited number of situations and with a limited number of drugs, in most instances, finding a “bio-marker” — the piece of evidence that identifies key differences — “may be much more complicated.”

Just as doctors use combinations of age, race, gender, medical history and genetics to make diagnoses and devise treatments, there may be a cluster of bio-markers involved in diseases and their treatments.

With so many variables at work, Davidian said, “routine personalized medicine may be decades away.”

But on the positive side, she said, a vast amount of medical data is becoming available through electronic medical records — data researchers at universities, drug companies and other medical concerns hope they can harness with the power of computers and analyze with powerful tools developed by statisticians.

If they can isolate the “bio markers” that play key roles in diseases and disease processes, they hope to be able to use them to tailor tests and treatments to individual needs.

Davidian said one goal of the overall effort is to provide meaningful enough data to help physicians make the best choice for their patients at each decision point along the way.

She offered as an example a patient with cancer.

After the initial diagnosis, a doctor has to choose which drug to use.

If drug A eradicates the cancer on the first try, Davidian said, the doctor then must decide what treatment, if any, is needed to maintain that success.

If drug A does not work, the doctor may have to choose among choices B, C and D, and if the first again doesn’t work, make additional decisions from there.

Meanwhile, even if drug A was effective, there may be a range of choices along that route of care.

Statisticians hope a method they call the Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial, or SMART, can track down the variables involved with all these choices at each decision point and provide a statistically significant means of determining which choices work out best.

For instance, if drug A is not effective, the information may allow the doctor to decide whether drug B, C or D is most likely to be effective.

If successful in doing that, she said, statisticians may be able to give doctors better information for designing more formalized regimes of treatment.

“I would never see purely … data driven (measures) being widely used” as the sole means of making medical decisions, Davidian said.

“I hope to see these kinds of things inform” doctors and so they can better decide about the right treatment for the right patient at the right time.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in News

Texas police officer shot, killed; suspect dead
Texas police officer shot, killed; suspect dead

A Texas police officer reportedly was shot and killed Tuesday afternoon while responding to a call about an armed man outside a house in Little Elm, a Dallas suburb.
Light drizzle for morning commute, dry time and sun to return
Light drizzle for morning commute, dry time and sun to return

Light drizzle early this morning Drying out this afternoon through Thursday More rain Friday and Sunday Today: Light drizzle will be possible through sunrise this morning leading to some wet roadways, said Storm Center 7 Meteorologist Brett Collar. Temperatures will start in the upper 30s and will eventually rise to the low to mid-40s this afternoon...
Ex-'Apprentice' contestant Summer Zervos files defamation lawsuit against Trump
Ex-'Apprentice' contestant Summer Zervos files defamation lawsuit against Trump

On Tuesday, former “Apprentice” contestant Summer Zervos held a press conference with lawyer Gloria Allred to announce that she is filing a defamation lawsuit against President-elect Donald Trump. One month before Election Day, Zervos claimed that she was subjected to “unwanted sexual touches” by Trump during a business...
Former President George H.W. Bush hospitalized
Former President George H.W. Bush hospitalized

Former President George H.W. Bush is in stable condition at a Houston hospital, KHOU reported early Wednesday. Bush's chief of staff, Jean Becker, told KHOU that Bush, 92, is "doing fine." Jim McGrath, spokesman for Bush and his wife, Barbara, later tweeted that Bush was taken to Houston Methodist Hospital on Saturday for "shortness...
No, President Obama didn't pardon Chelsea Manning; here's what he did instead
No, President Obama didn't pardon Chelsea Manning; here's what he did instead

It was announced Tuesday that President Obama commuted the sentence of famed whistleblower Chelsea Manning. And no, this is not the same as a pardon, despite the hopes of many privacy and human rights advocates. Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution grants Obama the executive power of clemency. With this, he can choose...
More Stories