You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to SpringfieldNewsSun.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and interactive features. Starting at just 99c for 8 weeks.

X

Welcome to SpringfieldNewsSun.com

Your source for Clark and Champaign counties’ hometown news. All readers have free access to a limited number of stories every month.

If you are a News-Sun subscriber, please take a moment to login for unlimited access.

Supreme Court to hear arguments in Ohio elections law case


You’ve probably never heard of Edna Davis. But the 80-year Republican from Northeast Ohio will have a role tomorrow when the U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments about a controversial Ohio law that bans false speech in election campaigns.

The Ohio election law in question prohibits anyone from making “a false statement concerning the voting record of a candidate or public official’’ or distributing information about an opponent that is known to be false with reckless regard for the truth.

As a Geauga County commissioner in 1985, Davis became one of only two people ever convicted of violating the law when she provided information to a GOP candidate to use in a newspaper advertisement against his opponent.

A judge sentenced her to 60 days in jail and fined her $1,000. Although the judge suspended the jail sentence and reduced the fine to $300, he placed Davis on probation for two years, forcing her to get permission from parole officers to visit her brother in California.

“I can laugh now,’’ said Davis, who will not attend the arguments. “Back then I didn’t laugh for a year. It was probably one of the worst days of my life. I was very, very angry and hurt too. There was no really good reason for it.’’

Three decades after the Davis case, the justices are hearing oral arguments on the same law as they decide whether the anti-abortion non-profit Susan B. Anthony List can challenge the law in federal court in Cincinnati. Fifteen other states have similar laws. Proponents contend that without such laws, politicians and independent organizations will not hesitate to bombard their opponents with commercials that are outright lies.

The case before the court is from the 2010 elections when Susan B. Anthony wanted to charge that by voting for the 2010 health law, then-U.S. Rep. Steve Driehaus, D-Cincinnati, supported paying for abortions with taxpayer dollars.

When Driehaus’ attorney threatened to sue, the billboard’s owner declined to put up the advertisement. Driehaus then filed a complaint to the elections commission which found “probable cause’’ that the advertisement violated the law.

Driehaus dropped the complaint after being defeated by Republican Steve Chabot. But Susan B. Anthony List and a separate group - the Coalition Opposed to Additional Spending and Taxes – filed suit in federal court charging the law violated the U.S. Constitution.

A federal judge and the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the lawsuits, ruling that neither organization could show it was harmed because the elections commission never issued a ruling.

Although the justices could strike down the law as unconstitutional, legal analysts expect them to narrowly decide whether Susan B. Anthony List can demonstrate it has been so harmed by the law – a legal concept known as standing – that it can sue the state of Ohio and the seven-member Ohio Elections Commission.

“We want our day in (a lower) court,’’ said Michael Carvin, a Washington attorney representing Susan B. Anthony List. “When we do get our day in court, I will vigorously argue the Ohio law is unconstitutional.’’

Ordinarily, an oral argument about legal standing and ripeness would be a ho-hum affair. But this case has prompted a blizzard of legal briefs filed by the U.S. Department of Justice, the American Civil Liberties, comedian P.J. O’Rourke, and the Republican National Committee.

In an even more unusual twist, Ohio Solicitor Eric Murphy will defend the actions of the state elections commission while his boss, Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine, filed a separate brief asserting the law is unconstitutional, prompting Washington legal blogger Marty Lederman to suggest the case should be re-titled DeWine v. DeWine.

The Justice Department, while not defending the law, argues that Susan B. Anthony List has “established a credible threat of prosecution’’ and deserves a chance to file its suit. But the federal government insists the anti-abortion organization cannot challenge a separate law that requires it to disclose its financial donors.

Davis and three co-defendants were convicted in 1985 of violating the law, but a state court of appeals invalidated two of the convictions. Unfortunately for Davis and a second defendant, the court of appeals upheld their convictions, although neither went to jail.

Under the law, which was approved in the early 1970s and amended in 1976, a candidate can file a complaint with the Ohio Elections Commission, which investigates the charges. Philip Richter, executive director of the elections commission, said the panel received 26 complaints last year compared to 46 in 2012, 46 in 2011 and 96 in 2010.

Richter said since 1995, the commission has recommended prosecution for only five cases. But except for a 2008 case from Ashtabula County, in which a settlement was reached, prosecutors have been reluctant to prosecute anyone.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in News

Clark County receives mixed results for air quality
Clark County receives mixed results for air quality

Clark County received mixed results on its air quality, according to a recent report from the American Lung Association. The county received an F grade for its ozone quality, but received an A grade for short-term particle pollution, according to the Association’s State of the Air 2017 report. RELATED: Springfield leader wants lifetime warranty...
Missing Alabama teen found safe in Texas 16 months later
Missing Alabama teen found safe in Texas 16 months later

An Alabama teen who vanished without a trace two years ago after taking out the trash has been found. Alissia Freeman, who was more than 1,000 miles away in El Paso, Texas, reached out to her mother, Vickie Metcalf, on a video call Monday after being out of contact with her family since she disappeared on Dec. 13, 2015. She was 17 at the time...
Demolition of Ohio bridge doesn’t go as planned
Demolition of Ohio bridge doesn’t go as planned

UPDATE 7:37: The implosion of the Jeremiah Morrow Bridge on I-71 in Warren County didn’t go as planned Sunday morning. An ODOT spokesperson said one of the explosive charges came loose, leaving one of four sections standing. Matt Bruning, ODOT spokesman, said crews will look to attach another charge, and try to demolish the remaining bridge...
Rape case lawyer says women are 'especially good' at lying
Rape case lawyer says women are 'especially good' at lying

A lawyer for a wealthy Tennessee businessman who was later found not guilty in a Memphis rape trial made a comment during closing arguments Thursday that raised some eyebrows. According to WHBQ, Steve Farese, attorney for Mark Giannini, said women are "especially good" at lying. "People can be very good at lying," Farese said...
Donald Trump reveals where he'll be instead of the White House Correspondents' Dinner
Donald Trump reveals where he'll be instead of the White House Correspondents' Dinner

Every year, the White House Correspondents’ Dinner is one of the social events of the spring. For almost 100 years, journalists, government officials and celebrities have gotten together to crack jokes and eat expensive meals. The event has been attended by Frank Sinatra and Duke Ellington. In 2011, then-President Barack Obama roasted Donald...
More Stories