You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to SpringfieldNewsSun.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and interactive features. Starting at just 99c for 8 weeks.

X

Welcome to SpringfieldNewsSun.com

Your source for Clark and Champaign counties’ hometown news. All readers have free access to a limited number of stories every month.

If you are a News-Sun subscriber, please take a moment to login for unlimited access.

2 views of the State of the Union speech


Letters to the editor

‘Government not the only bad guy’

I thought President Obama’s speech was vastly improved over last year’s State of the Union, particularly in regard to education. Recognizing that schools need to be redesigned, that many students graduating high school should be career-ready, and that colleges should be held accountable for ever-increasing costs were steps in the right direction. These approaches are much more relevant than sending-everyone-to-college and lengthening-the-school-day approaches we have heard from his past speeches. Closing tax loopholes were also an important part of his speech.

Marco Rubio’s rebuttal was annoyingly partisan. Rand Paul seemed a little more mature and polished, but seemed to also misrepresent what I had just heard from the president. Contrary to what Paul said, I do not think the president took entitlements off the table. Despite what I think were some questionable comments on spending, poverty and the role of government, it is good for our democracy that people like Paul are speaking up on spending and fiscal issues. I just wish he would provide more detailed solutions and ideas, and recognize that greed at the top of the economic and business ladder can also drive poverty and economic and social dysfunction. “Big government” is not the only bad guy in town. MARY COLLIER, BEAVERCREEK

Discard ‘failed policies of socialism’

Listening to President Obama’s speech, it is clear he believes that innovation and job growth come from government and that government should be in control of more of the individual’s tax dollars.

It also sounds like Obama thinks government and government regulations, rules and programs are the main creators of wealth in America and, as a result, more tax dollars are needed to help government make America better.

Obama wants to spend more taxpayer money — which we do not have — on technology centers and other programs.

The fault in Obama’s logic is that the vast majority of goods and services Americans want or need come from the individual who takes a risk to succeed so they can profit. The government does not create profit; it only takes money from one and gives to another.

When the business environment is open for the individual to succeed and profit, the government can take in more revenue through taxes.

If taxation is so high and regulation so cumbersome that the individual does not take a risk so they can profit, neither will the government grow tax revenue.

Mr. President, be bold and courageous. Throw off the failed policies of socialism and large central planned government. History shows this has never worked. Cut government regulation and eliminate wasteful spending and programs. Reduce tax rates for all Americans. Trust the American citizen.

To do these great things will require a thick skin and a strong moral conviction, but history shows these concepts of smaller government lead to prosperity for all. You would be remembered as a great president if you take this action. MICHAEL KIRCHENS, BELLBROOK

Speak Up

I didn’t think President Obama could give a better speech than the one he delivered at his inaugural, but he did. If we each don’t make just 10 two-minute calls to our senator and representative this year, putting pressure on Congress to support sensible proposals suggested by this president, then we would be criminally negligent.

Re the State of the Union address: President Obama tells us we are going to do more of the same and expect a different result. Einstein defined that approach as insanity.

I thought President Obama’s speech was vastly improved over last year’s State of the Union, particularly in regard to education. Recognizing that schools need to be redesigned, that many students graduating high school should be career-ready, and that colleges should be held accountable for ever-increasing costs were steps in the right direction. These approaches are much more relevant than sending-everyone-to-college and lengthening-the-school-day approaches we have heard from his past speeches. Closing tax loopholes were also an important part of his speech.

Marco Rubio’s rebuttal was annoyingly partisan. Rand Paul seemed a little more mature and polished, but seemed to also misrepresent what I had just heard from the president. Contrary to what Paul said, I do not think the president took entitlements off the table. Despite what I think were some questionable comments on spending, poverty and the role of government, it is good for our democracy that people like Paul are speaking up on spending and fiscal issues. I just wish he would provide more detailed solutions and ideas, and recognize that greed at the top of the economic and business ladder can also drive poverty and economic and social dysfunction. “Big government” is not the only bad guy in town. MARY COLLIER, BEAVERCREEK

Discard ‘failed policies of socialism’

Listening to President Obama’s speech, it is clear he believes that innovation and job growth come from government and that government should be in control of more of the individual’s tax dollars.

It also sounds like Obama thinks government and government regulations, rules and programs are the main creators of wealth in America and, as a result, more tax dollars are needed to help government make America better.

Obama wants to spend more taxpayer money — which we do not have — on technology centers and other programs.

The fault in Obama’s logic is that the vast majority of goods and services Americans want or need come from the individual who takes a risk to succeed so they can profit. The government does not create profit; it only takes money from one and gives to another.

When the business environment is open for the individual to succeed and profit, the government can take in more revenue through taxes.

If taxation is so high and regulation so cumbersome that the individual does not take a risk so they can profit, neither will the government grow tax revenue.

Mr. President, be bold and courageous. Throw off the failed policies of socialism and large central planned government. History shows this has never worked. Cut government regulation and eliminate wasteful spending and programs. Reduce tax rates for all Americans. Trust the American citizen.

To do these great things will require a thick skin and a strong moral conviction, but history shows these concepts of smaller government lead to prosperity for all. You would be remembered as a great president if you take this action. MICHAEL KIRCHENS, BELLBROOK

Speak Up

I didn’t think President Obama could give a better speech than the one he delivered at his inaugural, but he did. If we each don’t make just 10 two-minute calls to our senator and representative this year, putting pressure on Congress to support sensible proposals suggested by this president, then we would be criminally negligent.

Re the State of the Union address: President Obama tells us we are going to do more of the same and expect a different result. Einstein defined that approach as insanity.

Listening to President Obama’s speech, it is clear he believes that innovation and job growth come from government and that government should be in control of more of the individual’s tax dollars.

It also sounds like Obama thinks government and government regulations, rules and programs are the main creators of wealth in America and, as a result, more tax dollars are needed to help government make America better.

Obama wants to spend more taxpayer money — which we do not have — on technology centers and other programs.

The fault in Obama’s logic is that the vast majority of goods and services Americans want or need come from the individual who takes a risk to succeed so they can profit. The government does not create profit; it only takes money from one and gives to another.

When the business environment is open for the individual to succeed and profit, the government can take in more revenue through taxes.

If taxation is so high and regulation so cumbersome that the individual does not take a risk so they can profit, neither will the government grow tax revenue.

Mr. President, be bold and courageous. Throw off the failed policies of socialism and large central planned government. History shows this has never worked. Cut government regulation and eliminate wasteful spending and programs. Reduce tax rates for all Americans. Trust the American citizen.

To do these great things will require a thick skin and a strong moral conviction, but history shows these concepts of smaller government lead to prosperity for all. You would be remembered as a great president if you take this action. MICHAEL KIRCHENS, BELLBROOK

Speak Up

I didn’t think President Obama could give a better speech than the one he delivered at his inaugural, but he did. If we each don’t make just 10 two-minute calls to our senator and representative this year, putting pressure on Congress to support sensible proposals suggested by this president, then we would be criminally negligent.

Re the State of the Union address: President Obama tells us we are going to do more of the same and expect a different result. Einstein defined that approach as insanity.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in News

National VA archives a vital piece of our history

Attorney Merle F. Wilberding is one of our regular community contributors. It became official last week, the day before President Obama left office. The head of the Veterans Administration signed an agreement that will put the Veterans Affairs National Archives at the local Dayton VA Medical Center, a project expected to generate an investment of about...
Millennials and marriage

Are Millennials the most studied and written-about generation in American history? Feels like it, sometimes. The latest came from staff writer Max Filby, in a story about how many in the Millennial generation are getting married much later in life than their parents or grandparents. “The median age at first marriage for women has risen from around...
Ill New Carlisle boy, 4, gets to enjoy Disney
Ill New Carlisle boy, 4, gets to enjoy Disney

A Special Wish Foundation-Dayton Chapter is the only wish granting organization located in the Dayton region. For more information on how you can be part of granting a local child’s wish, go online to www.aspecialwishdayton.org. A child’s wish, no matter the age, is incredibly special. Almost all of us have looked into the night sky waiting...
Burned toast, too crispy potatoes pose cancer risk, British food agency warns
Burned toast, too crispy potatoes pose cancer risk, British food agency warns

Burned toast or brown French fries are examples of over-cooked foods that could cause cancer due to a possible carcinogen they contain, according to the U.K.’s Food Standards Agency, or FSA. The FSA has launched a campaign aimed at getting people to “go for gold” when cooking some foods, including potatoes, root vegetables, toast...
Ivanka Trump's brother-in-law attends Women's March in DC
Ivanka Trump's brother-in-law attends Women's March in DC

The Women's March, which took place primarily in Washington, D.C., but also saw attendance in other major cities around the world, drew millions of women to advocate for women's rights and against discriminatory rhetoric used by President Donald Trump during his election campaign. Celebrities including Ashley Judd, Madonna and America Ferrera were...
More Stories