You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to SpringfieldNewsSun.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and interactive features. Starting at just 99c for 8 weeks.

X

Welcome to SpringfieldNewsSun.com

Your source for Clark and Champaign counties’ hometown news. All readers have free access to a limited number of stories every month.

If you are a News-Sun subscriber, please take a moment to login for unlimited access.

County seeks rehearing in turbine case


The Champaign County prosecutor and a group of area residents filed separate documents this week asking that the Ohio Power Siting Board reconsider parts or all of its decision approving a wind turbine project in Champaign County.

Earlier this year, members of the siting board approved the second phase of the Buckeye Wind project, allowing as many as 52 turbines to be built across six townships in the county.

Combined with an earlier phase that received an earlier approval, it would mean a total of about 100 turbines lining the county’s rural landscape.

But the request from the Champaign County Prosecutor’s Office raised several questions about the state’s decision, including an argument that the turbines should be placed further from homes.

Turbines must be placed at least 541 feet from a non-participating land owner’s property line under the current agreement, and at least 919 feet from a non-participating house.

The prosecutor’s appeal argued those setbacks don’t go far enough, and that the state should instead use recommendations from turbine manufacturers. The model of turbines Buckeye will use hasn’t been selected, but prosecutors pointed out that one manufacturer recommends clearing an area of about 1,300 feet in the event of a turbine fire.

Officials from the wind company couldn’t be reached for comment Friday, but have argued the project follows strict state standards, including making sure it would be safe for residents. Attorneys from Buckeye Wind haven’t filed their response to the request for a rehearing.

Representatives from the wind farm have argued the project’s second phase could mean as much as $55 million to the local economy. It would also create between eight and 10 full-time jobs after construction is complete, and provide enough renewable energy to power as many as 40,000 homes.

In their rehearing request, prosecutors acknowledged that the 1,300 feet distance to a home is meant as a temporary space to clear in an emergency, but pointed out that the setback is meant to ensure the safety of residents.

“It is surprising then, that the OPSB would still allow a setback of 919 feet to occupied, non-participating structures when, in essence, a manufacturer has indicated that such setback is within an unsafe radius of the turbine,” prosecutors argue.

Prosecutors also asked the state to review other portions of the initial decision, including seeking additional assurances that the cost to decommission the project would be covered by the company.

Members of Union Neighbors United, a group opposed to the wind farm, also requested the siting board reconsider its decision. That request raised several issues, ranging from the noise and distance from nearby homes to whether there is a need for the project.

“Furthermore, the significant adverse impacts of this project on the host community of Champaign County far outweigh the public benefit of the project,” the request from UNU states. “Indeed, there is insufficient evidence that this project is even necessary for renewable energy production.”

If members of the siting board reaffirm their decision, opponents could appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

New Carlisle once again looks for city hall location
New Carlisle once again looks for city hall location

The city of New Carlisle is once again looking for a City Hall location after a proposed site fell through. The Belle Manor Nursing home was going to be turned over to the city after Dayview Care Center and Belle Manor merged. The former Dayview center underwent a $5 million expansion that added 35,000 square feet to its location and then became the...
Drug crisis traumatizing children in Clark County, state
Drug crisis traumatizing children in Clark County, state

The deepening drug crisis in Clark County and Ohio threatens to leave thousands of traumatized children in its wake, local and state experts said. The Family and Children Services division of the Clark County Department of Job and Family Services has investigated at least 33 cases this year of children who were in danger because of an adult overdose...
Springfield to offer up to $100K in loans for home improvements
Springfield to offer up to $100K in loans for home improvements

The city of Springfield is now offering zero-interest loans to residents who are looking to make exterior improvements to their properties. The program will be available to owner-occupants of single-family homes who want to install new windows, vinyl siding or related treatment, such as soffits, Springfield Housing Rehabilitation Coordinator Ed Leinasars...
Gianforte projected to win Montana special election despite alleged attack on reporter
Gianforte projected to win Montana special election despite alleged attack on reporter

Greg Gianforte - the Republican Congressional candidate charged with assaulting a reporter the day before Montana’s special election - was projected as the winner defeating Democrat Rob Quist, according to Dave Wassserman of fivethirtyeight.com. Gianforte was caught on audio allegedly attacking reporter Ben Jacobs of The Guardian U.S. Jacobs...
Ohio Supreme Court rules juveniles can be sent to adult court
Ohio Supreme Court rules juveniles can be sent to adult court

A split Ohio Supreme Court ruled Thursday that sending older juveniles to adult court when they face serious charges does not violate their constitutional rights. The decision reverses a ruling by the high court in December 2016. Supreme Court Justice Sharon Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion that an earlier decision failed to consider a clause...
More Stories