No 4th trial for Ryan Widmer


In a strongly worded opinion, the 12th District Court of Appeals denied convicted bathtub killer Ryan Widmer’s attempt to get a fourth trial in Warren County and even chided his attorney over some of her assertions.

The 12th District Court of Appeals released its opinion in Widmer’s second appeal Monday morning. The appeals court renewed its opinion that Judge Neal Bronson ruled correctly that information about lead detective Jeff Braley’s penchant for dishonesty wasn’t crucial to the case. The same court denied Widmer’s first appeal, which focused heavily on what the defense claimed was an illegal seizure of the infamous bathtub.

Widmer’s attorney, Michele Berry-Godsey, touched on Braley’s dishonesty in the first appeal, but the court of appeals determined Judge Neal Bronson was not wrong to disallow evidence that Braley lied on a 14-year-old job application. The judges reiterated that stance, saying the knowledge of Braley’s apparent dishonesty would not have changed the verdict.

“Braley was not on trial for fraud or misconduct,” the opinion reads. “Widmer was on trial for murder and examining this part of Braley’s past would only lead to surprise, jury confusion and a waste of time, which are the very reasons for the rule against impeachment on collateral matters.”

Braley resigned last year after an investigation revealed he lied on his job application about his educational and employment experience. Berry-Godsey said Braley lied about his service in the “ultra-elite” Special Forces unit of the U.S. Air Force — which helped him get promoted —and jurors should have been told that.

Berry-Godsey claimed Widmer deserved a new trial based on “new” evidence in the form of a report generated by attorney Douglas Miller, with Donnellon, Donnellon & Miller (DD&M) who was hired by Hamilton Twp. trustees to look into Braley’s situation and an affidavit by Dennis Waller, an expert on police practices.

Prosecutors have said Braley was a bit-player in the Widmer case and the court agreed, saying plenty of other witnesses’s testimony backed up Braley’s. The court also ruled Widmer had no right under the law to have his wife’s DNA tested for some previously undiagnosed medical issue.

The 32-year-old is serving 15 years to life for drowning his wife, Sarah, in the bathtub in August 2008. In Widmer’s first trial, he was found guilty of murder, but that verdict was thrown out after jurors admitted to conducting at-home experiments and discussed their results during deliberations. They admitted to bathing and timing how long it took to dry. Only Sarah’s hair was damp when first responders arrived, and no wet towels or rags could be found.

The second trial ended with a hung jury after jurors said they could not make a decision after 2 1/2 days. The third verdict came after 13 days of testimony from 44 witnesses and a dozen hours of deliberations.

The court also noted when they asked Berry-Godsey during oral argument if there is any evidence Braley mishandled evidence, she implied the tub may have been tampered with. The judges said this “troubled” them because there was no evidence tampering.

“Widmer’s counsel seemed to embellish the record in order to excite the passions of the media and public on this issue,” Hendrickson wrote in a footnote. “We feel compelled to note that this almost crosses the line from permissible appellate advocacy to impermissible hyperbole that so distorts the evidence that it borders upon the absurd.”

Prosecutor David Fornshell said he was not surprised that the 55-page ruling sided with Bronson on actions he took in the case.

“These, from a legal standpoint, from our perspective, were not really close calls,” he said. “They threw a lot at the court and asked them to consider a number of different issues, but each of them individually, there really was no merit.”

Berry-Godsey said she will appeal the decision to the Ohio Supreme Court and said she disagreed with the judges’ comment about her.

“It appears that the court overlooked important parts of the court records, and as a result, failed to understand our argument about why the bathtub isn’t reliable evidence,” she said. “We strongly disagree with the Court’s assessment and will continue fighting for justice for Ryan.”

The high court has yet to decide if it will accept her first appeal.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in News

Student of the Week Shawnee High School
Student of the Week Shawnee High School

Name: Tyra Huxley School: Shawnee High School Grade: 12 Age: 17 Extra-curricular: National Honor Society, Volleyball, Prom and Homecoming Committees, Student Council, Track, Summer Internship Program - currently an intern at Yamada N.A. Claim to fame/honors: Becoming President of Shawnee’s National Honor Society Words you live by: “If you&rsquo...
TODAY’S MODERATOR: A new kind of 911

The abuse of 911 services has been much-covered, especially so-called “frequent flyers” who more or less use the calls as their primary health care. In many cities, costs are out of hand. According to The Atlantic, Memphis is trying a new approach. “Since April, the city has been engaged in an experiment to take some pressure off...
Athlete of the Week Shawnee High School
Athlete of the Week Shawnee High School

Name: Grant Engle School: Shawnee High School Grade: 12 Age: 17 Sports: Boys Golf Claim to fame/honors: 8th in the State Tournament, 3-time CBC Player of the Year Words you live by: “All of your dreams can come true, if you have the courage to pursue them.” Toughest opponent: My brother, Clark Engle Biggest influence: My mom and dad What&rsquo...
A Lighter Look: Anticipating the joys of grandmotherhood

I was talking with my friend whose daughter was expecting her first child any day. With the new world of grandparenthood looming, she was anxious with excitement. Her words betrayed varying emotions, which we all know can take hold any time while feeling the angst of the unknown. I appreciated her honesty as she wondered, “Will my daughter still...
Neighbor amazed to see group of teens cleaning up neighborhood
Neighbor amazed to see group of teens cleaning up neighborhood

When a man learned why a group of Georgia youth were cleaning up their neighborhood, he started recording. Al Grant, of Taylor County, is praising 14 young men for taking initiative and doing good for the community. When Grant asked the young men who made them come out and clean, they responded in unison, nobody." "We aren't in trouble,"...
More Stories