Native Americans ride with raised fists to a sacred burial ground that was disturbed by bulldozers building the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), near the encampment where hundreds of people have gathered to join the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe's protest of the oil pipeline slated to cross the nearby Missouri River, September 4, 2016 near Cannon Ball, North Dakota. Protestors were attacked by dogs and sprayed with an eye and respiratory irritant yesterday when they arrived at the site to protest after learning of the bulldozing work. / AFP / ROBYN BECK (Photo credit should read ROBYN BECK/AFP/Getty Images)
Photo: ROBYN BECK
Photo: ROBYN BECK

Judge halts part of Dakota access pipeline, but a bigger decision looms

The Standing Rock Sioux tribe won a small victory in its attempt to stop an oil pipeline from being built near its land.

A lawsuit temporarily halted some of the pipeline's construction after a judge ruled the Army Corps of Engineers didn't have jurisdiction on private land. In the suit, the tribe said the developer of the Dakota Access Pipeline "desecrated and destroyed" land where chiefs and other leaders were buried.

>> Read more trending stories  

But the ruling only applies to land east of a local highway. The judge said all the land to the west of the highway is fair game, which the tribe considered a major disappointment.

"This decision puts our people's sacred sites at risk for continued ruining and desecrating what's important to us," Sioux chairman Dave Archambault said.

The $3.8 billion pipeline is set to pump oil along a 1,100-mile stretch between North Dakota and Illinois. The company said it hasn't damaged any historical sites during construction.

But the Sioux say opposing the pipeline isn't just to preserve their past. They're also concerned about what it could mean for their future.

Tribal leaders are worried that the pipeline was constructed too quickly and could rupture, contaminating their drinking water, which comes from the Missouri River.

"Everything that oil is used for, there's an alternative for, there's a renewable alternative for that oil. There is no alternative for water," a Sioux tribe member told Newsy.

A resolution could be coming soon. In July, the tribe filed a lawsuit that alleges the Army Corps of Engineers didn't follow federal laws when it gave the company the go-ahead to drill under the river. 

The case could prompt the judge to issue a permanent injunction against the pipeline. That ruling is expected by the end of the week.

Thank you for reading the Springfield News-Sun and for supporting local journalism. Subscribers: log in for access to your daily ePaper and premium newsletters.

Thank you for supporting in-depth local journalism with your subscription to the Springfield News-Sun. Get more news when you want it with email newsletters just for subscribers. Sign up here.

X