Here’s an insight: Symbolic changes won’t fix Washington.
The empty gesture of area Reps. Steve Austria, R-Beavercreek, and Jim Jordan, R-Urbana, announcing they will not seek earmarks in the coming year is just another diversion from the real business of governing.
And it’s an abdication by both of them to represent the best interests of their districts.
The blanket announcement is a counter move by Republicans to the Democrats in the House who made their own symbolic gesture of ending earmarks going to for-profit organizations.
If you smell an election approaching, you’d be on the right scent.
Everyone is against a Bridge to Nowhere, sponsorship secrecy and pay-to-play fraud — all abuses of the process.
But most earmarks serve a useful function by making possible projects that would be impossible to fund by other means. Earmarks allow representatives a chance to make their district’s particular needs a priority in the national budget.
Springfield has benefitted greatly from former Rep. David Hobson’s use of earmarks to spur public and private economic projects here. There are few major projects locally that didn’t benefit from the earmark process in some way.
If you have needed cancer treatment, ridden a bikeway, seen a concert in Cliff Park or used a sewer, there’s a good chance one of Hobson’s earmarks made it possible.
Both Austria and Jordan, by simply saying no to all earmarks, are denying their constituents the ability to compete for money that will now go to other districts.
Would Austria or Jordan forgo an opportunity to attract jobs to the area if an earmark would help? Jordan has sought earmarks for flood control and the Lima Army Tank Plant. Does he now regret doing that?
Both representatives should be able to discern good projects from bad ones. The process is now very transparent and voters can pass judgment if they spend the public’s money foolishly.
The national debt is growing and the federal government needs to fix that. That means representatives need to look at entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare, the military budget and tax rates.
While they’re at it, they might look at the ways corporate America has ripped off the public.
When they finish all that, then they might take a look at the tiny sliver of the budget that is earmarks.
Start your day with top headlines in your inbox and get breaking news e-mail alerts at any time by subscribing to our Headlines e-mail newsletter.
See Sample | Privacy Policy
1:58 PM, 4/6/2010
9:38 PM, 3/16/2010
4:26 PM, 3/16/2010
9:05 AM, 3/16/2010
8:54 AM, 3/16/2010