COLUMBUS — Like it or not, lawmakers will be asked this year to overhaul the state’s public pension systems that serve 1.7 million Ohioans and cost local governments more than $4 billion a year.
It’ll be an epic struggle among powerful interest groups to determine how the burden of shoring up the pension systems is shared.
Teachers, cops and firefighters may be asked to work longer. Retirees will likely face higher medical costs. And taxpayers may be asked to chip in as much as $5 billion toward the pension systems, if lawmakers accept proposed increases from two of the state’s five public pension funds.
The Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund and State Teachers Retirement System are asking for rate increases that, over the next five years alone, would cost local governments hundreds of millions of dollars.
State Sen. Kirk Schuring, R-Canton, described the viability of making taxpayers shell out more through higher employer contributions as “highly unlikely, probably impossible,” given the economic slump and the financial struggles local governments already face.
Still, some change is inevitable. Thanks to market losses, skyrocketing health care costs and baby boomer retirees living longer, nobody thinks the current system is sustainable without changes. The market has rebounded some, but investment portfolios from the five pension systems lost a staggering $56.6 billion in 2008.
“This isn’t just putting a new coat of paint on the house” said Ken Thomas, a city of Dayton employee who chairs the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System board, which is proposing adding two years to the eligibility age for a full pension for its members. “This is re-doing the foundation.”
None of the proposed changes, however, call for following the private sector into 401(k)-type plans that might ease the burden on local governments and schools.
“The goal should be to continue the defined-benefit plan,” said state Rep. Todd Book, a Portsmouth Democrat who chairs the Ohio Retirement Study Council.
Opposition to raising employer contribution rates already has begun to surface. In Springboro, where multiple levy defeats have forced the district to close a school, cut back on busing routes, lay off workers and boost participation fees for extracurricular activities, the proposal is about as welcome as an H1N1 outbreak.
“The community already feels we compensate every employee in our school system wonderfully,” said Kelly Kohls, who was elected to the school board in November. “We’ve been very generous.”
Anthony Gottschlich of the Dayton Daily News and James Nash of the Columbus Dispatch contributed to this report.
Start your day with top headlines in your inbox and get breaking news e-mail alerts at any time by subscribing to our Headlines e-mail newsletter.
See Sample | Privacy Policy
9:24 PM, 1/25/2010
i had to retire 7 years early due to herniated disc,and industrial asthma,plus a host of mental issues which i will spare you from,i pay 800 dollars a month for healthcare for my family,
and am now eligible for medicaid,ohioheap,and a host of other social programs!!
yeah we are all retiring rich over here in the public sector!
yes bob the first poster,not every one is living like a fat cat off of your tax money!
come get sum
10:25 AM, 1/16/2010
If these tax eaters think people in the private sector who get NO pensions and are just lucky to even have a job and are struggling to get by are going to agree to further tax increases so government workers can get pensions no one else gets, well the got another thing coming.
Go ahead and push it tax eaters. But you've got to ask yourself one question: "Do I feel lucky?" Well, do ya, punk? ...
2:26 AM, 1/6/2010
11:05 AM, 1/5/2010
8:48 AM, 1/5/2010