The Adobe Flash Player is required to view this multimedia interactive. Get it here.
Home  >  News  >  Election

Ohio voters approve livestock care board

Hot Topics

Related

The Associated Press Updated 7:01 AM Wednesday, November 4, 2009

COLUMBUS — Ohio voters have delivered a victory to large farm operators, approving a new industry-dominated board to oversee livestock care.

With 45 percent of precincts reporting Tuesday, the issue was leading 65 percent to 35 percent.

The measure was designed to thwart efforts of animal rights groups such as the Humane Society of the United States that are intent on outlawing the close confinement of laying hens, breeding sows and veal calves.

Laws outlawing keeping those animals in cramped cages or crates have passed in seven states.

The ballot issue was viewed as a blueprint for other rural states to avoid such laws being imposed.

Ohio's livestock care board will have 13 members of both parties representing farmers, veterinarians, food safety experts, and consumers. It will have one animal rights advocate.

The Humane Society vowed Tuesday to mount a future Ohio ballot campaign instituting farm animal protections.

We have laws to protect domestic animals and prosecute those who are cruel to them. Why should there be any exceptions towards the inhumane treatment of livestock? We have partaken in the consumption of God's creation of animals as a food source since biblical times. It is not expensive to excercise the humane treatment of livestock during their short lifespan. The raising of livestock is a business, but it need not be an inhumane one. Enjoy a profit, but be compassionate. Thanks.
Slightly Right
7:55 PM, 11/4/2009
It is an unfortunate day for the small farmer focused on sustainable naturally grown methods. I have run a small organic farm with my spouse for 4 years and are very concerned about the implications of this issue. Hopefully this new board will not regulate us out of business.
small sustainable farmer
2:35 PM, 11/4/2009
Farmers should not be allowed to keep a pig in a cage to where they cant even turn around or move an inch either way. That is crap and we can do better than that! If people seen how these animals were actually cages it would have passed by an even wider margin as it should of.
Hank
1:10 PM, 11/4/2009
Too bad the 'yes' voters did not take the time to talk to the small farmers that this will hurt a great deal.
Mike
12:57 PM, 11/4/2009
God have mercy on the farm animals. Isn't it only right to give them some quality of life instead of a confined space that they can't even move around in. Oh but wait, that takes compassion and money. Agribusiness can't do that. It is a shame the opposition to this issue did not have more financing and support behind them. Humane Society don't give up!! If people really knew what was going on in some of these so-called family farms they would not like it. You need to get the word out.
Big Mistake
12:12 PM, 11/4/2009
There are 16 additional comments
SHOW ALL
We welcome your comments. Please remember this is a public forum and behave appropriately. Your comments must conform to our visitor's agreement.

The form has errors highlighted in red, please review these entries and try again!



Comments are limited to 500 characters


500 character limit

Incorrect please try again


These words come from scanned books.
Entering them helps digitize old texts.


Election results

Election photos & videos

Copyright © 2009 Springfield News-Sun, Springfield, Ohio, USA.All rights reserved.

By using this site, you accept the terms of our Visitors Agreement and Privacy Policy. About our ads. You may wish to note our other business policies.